Shaykh Abd Al-Razzāq ʿAfīfī (1415h) on the Core Doctrine of the First Khārijites|
Posted by Abu Iyaad on Saturday, October, 22 2016 and filed under Scholars
Shaykh ʿAbd al-Razzāq ʿAfīfī (1415H) wrote:
Mudhakkirat al-Tawḥīḍ (pp. 68-69)
Note: The Khārijites’ issue was pertaining to taḥkīm (arbitration), they believed upon their ignorance that ʿAlī had given men the right of judgement which belongs only to Allāh. This is similar to the ignoramuses of today such as Abū Muḥammad al-Maqdisī, Sayyid Imām and other hardcore Khārijites who claim that the rulers have become pagans and idolators on account of matters that the Sharīʿah permits such as as truces, treaties, giving gifts to non-Muslim rulers, diplomatic relations, trade relations, legislation in matters of broad public interest (customs, immigration, road regulations) and so on. The core engine of Khārijite ideology is revolt against the ruler on account of perceived sin or actual sin and oppression, all justified with takfīr of the ruler built upon exaggeration in the issue of ḥākimiyyah. The basic formula then is ḥākimiyyah, takfīr, khurūj. And this is the religion of Abū Aʿlā al-Mawdūdī, Sayyid Quṭb, Ayman al-Zawāhirī, Abū Qatādah, Abū Muḥammad al-Maqdisī, the generality of al-Qaeda, ISIS and others.
As is known and established in the books of history and creed that it is not a condition for being a Khārijite that one must make takfīr of Muslims on account of sin. Thus, what is done by members of al-Qaeda, ISIS and their spiritual leaders (or former ones) such as Abū Qatādah, Abū Muḥammad al-Maqdisī and others of denying that they make takfīr of Muslims by way of sin or apply general rulings of takfīr upon whole societies is deception by which they delue the ignorant and also deceive ignorant, uninformed Western academics. Believing in the permissibility of revolting against a Muslim ruler (due to his sin and oppression) is a matter separate to making takfīr of Muslims by way of major sins. They justify this act by exaggerating in ḥākimiyyah and do their utmost to prove the disbelief of the ruler [so as to validate their actions]. This is what unites all Khārijites and is the central core of their innovated religion. As for making takfīr of Muslims on account of major sins or of whole societies, these are later developments amongst the Khārijites and not all of them subscribe to these doctrines. Thus, there are refutations between the Khārijites themselves, and some refer to others as Khārijites. Hence, we see the hardcore Khārijite, Abū Muḥammad al-Maqdisī refute those amongst his followers who make takfīr of Muslims on account of major sins or of whole societies. Alongside this, al-Maqdisī remains a hardcore Khārijite because the central core of his innovated religion still remains.